Both macro and micro editing hold importance in the process of making an accurate, newsworthy story. With micro editing, you focus on the small details such as grammar and spelling. With macro editing, you look at the big picture by checking facts and determining if the story is ethical.
I naturally focus on grammar and spelling first and typically have to remind myself to check the facts. I prefer micro editing. Which do you prefer?
Both micro and macro are essential to successful copy editing, but I would argue macro editing has a higher standard. Fact checking could determine whether a libelous or unethical story gets printed. Copy editors are the final line of defense before copy gets sent to the printing press. I have always been told to look it up when in doubt or to call a reporter.
ReplyDelete